Skip to content

What's the ROI?

 

 

How to interpret your results:

Use our ROI calculator to model potential outcomes based on your inputs. Examples shown are illustrative; results vary depending on execution cadence.

 

Example: Time and Cost savings

Even with a lightweight cadence, improvement work creates operational overhead: tracking progress, chasing updates, and spending time working out what actions to take.

Before:

    • Improvement lead: 4-8 hours per month tracking, chasing, and researching actions
    • Contributors: 10-20 actions per month need a nudge; each nudge costs 5-10 minutes to reply, find the latest status, and context-switch

After (with Oprising):

    • Owners update actions at the time, so progress is visible without chasing
    • The improvement lead uses dashboards, owners, deadlines, and definitions of “done” to keep work moving

Illustrative impact:

    • Improvement lead time saved: 3-6 hours per month (36-72 hours per year)
    • Contributor chase time saved: 50-200 minutes per month (0.8-3.3 hours per month) across the team
    • Total time saved: 3.8-9.3 hours per month (46-112 hours per year)

We measure the time and cost saved running the improvement process itself, plus further savings generated by the improvement initiatives delivered.

 

Example: impact at scale

If you are coordinating a bigger programme (25 people, 100 actions), the time lost to chasing and meeting overruns multiplies fast - particularly when updates are not available on time. By the time you get to the quarterly meeting, you are digging out status for everything - including items that are closed or on track and do not need airtime in a time-sensitive session. The meeting becomes a status update exercise, not a decision-making session.

Oprising keeps updates, owners, and evidence in one place, so meetings focus on decisions, blockers, and priorities - not chasing and reconstruction.