Per-MSP Pricing:
Operational chaos has a measurable cost: margin loss, stalled initiatives, unnecessary headcount, and recurring issues that absorb capacity and damage customer experience.
Oprising builds a repeatable, in‑house improvement capability for Operational Excellence that improves performance while reducing operational drag.
When it comes to pricing, the theme of collaboration was really important to us, so our pricing model had to be super simple and encourage collaboration - so all users had to be able to access the platform and not be a per seat model. Even if you are working with a bunch of consultants or other service businesses, it was important that they too could access the platform so that everyone is joined up on what they are working towards. So, we have introduced:
Super Simple Plans:
£75 per month, unlimited users - priced to be an operational decision, not a procurement event. Less than the cost of one day of consultant time, and built to reduce the ongoing cost of firefighting, rework, escalations, and stalled initiatives.
Optional enablement: multi‑day assessment and setup support when required.
Where the return comes from:
- Reduced consultant spend
- Less firefighting through systemic fixes
- Reduced churn and increased pricing strength
- Faster assessments and clearer priorities
- Lower rework, overtime, and operational waste
ROI at a glance:
Use our ROI calculator to model potential outcomes based on your inputs. Examples shown are illustrative; results vary depending on execution cadence.
Example: Time and Cost savings
Even with a lightweight cadence, improvement work creates operational overhead: tracking progress, chasing updates, and spending time working out what actions to take.
Before:
- Improvement lead: 4-8 hours per month tracking, chasing, and researching actions
- Contributors: 10-20 actions per month need a nudge; each nudge costs 5-10 minutes to reply, find the latest status, and context-switch
After (with Oprising):
- Owners update actions at the time, so progress is visible without chasing
- The improvement lead uses dashboards, owners, deadlines, and definitions of “done” to keep work moving
Illustrative impact:
- Improvement lead time saved: 3-6 hours per month (36-72 hours per year)
- Contributor chase time saved: 50-200 minutes per month (0.8-3.3 hours per month) across the team
- Total time saved: 3.8-9.3 hours per month (46-112 hours per year)
We measure the time and cost saved running the improvement process itself, plus further savings generated by the improvement initiatives delivered.
Example: impact at scale
If you are coordinating a bigger programme (10 people, 50 actions), the time lost to chasing and meeting overruns multiplies fast - particularly when updates are not available on time. By the time you get to the quarterly meeting, you are digging out status for everything - including items that are closed or on track and do not need airtime in a time-sensitive session. The meeting becomes a status update exercise, not a decision-making session.
Oprising keeps updates, owners, and evidence in one place, so meetings focus on decisions, blockers, and priorities - not chasing and reconstruction.